Here is the article where Engdahl explains his Damascene conversion.
Confessions of an “ex” Peak Oil BelieverHe falls at the first fence. His first comment is: "The good news is that panic scenarios about the world running out of oil anytime soon are wrong". This is the straw man argument that is used, again and again, to avoid having to address the real issue of an energy plateau, and its corollary, supply and demand imbalance.
As I said above, Engdahl is very smart, so does he genuinely believe in the ludicrous notion of oil wells magically refilling? Maybe he does, but anyone who applies critical thinking to the issues would not fall into that trap. And his cheap jibe - "Texas banker Matt Simmons" speaks volumes, at least to me, as does "dead dinosaur remains". He is trying to smear and ridicule.
My hunch is Engdahl has a blind spot. I could be wrong, but I just cannot believe that someone as intelligent as Engdahl, uses such cheap jibes in his analysis. Nor can I believe any intelligent person throws out such an easily demolished statement as "The good news is that panic scenarios about the world running out of oil anytime soon are wrong".
The "panic scenarios" jibe is the giveaway imo.
@ Jimmy McNulty - yes, some of his analyses are damned insightful.
Edited for clarification of a point.